Toledo v. Klink
Klink
Citation
2025 Ohio 2316
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided
June 30, 2025
Jurisdiction
SA
Importance
45%
Case Summary
[Cite as Toledo v. Klink, 2025-Ohio-2316.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY City of Toledo/State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-24-1251 L-24-1252 Appellee Trial Court No. 23 CRB 9484 23 CRB 11629 v. Nicole Klink DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant Decided: June 30, 2025 ***** Rebecca Facey, City of Toledo Prosecuting Attorney, and Jimmie Jones, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Autumn Adams, for appellant. ***** MAYLE, J. {¶ 1} In this consolidated appeal, following a bench trial, defendant-appellant, Nicole Klink, appeals the October 3, 2024 judgment of the Toledo Municipal Court, convicting her of two counts of domestic violence, one count of menacing, and one count of assault. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court judgment. I. Background {¶ 2} On the night of September 28, 2023, Klink and her husband, M.K., had an argument that became violent. At the time, Klink’s daughter and M.K.’s son, B.K., were also in the house. B.K. overheard the fight and called 911. When the police arrived, they spoke to everyone in the house and arrested Klink. After Klink’s arrest, the police filed complaints that became the subject of two separate cases. In Toledo Municipal Court case No. CRB-23-09484, Klink was charged with domestic violence menacing, a violation of R.C. 2919.25(C), a fourth-degree misdemeanor, and menacing, a violation of R.C. 2903.22(A), a fourth-degree misdemeanor. In Toledo Municipal Court case No. CRB-23-11629, Klink was charged with domestic violence assault, a violation of R.C. 2919.25(A), a first-degree misdemeanor, and assault, a violation of R.C. 2903.13(A), a first-degree misdemeanor. {¶ 3} Before trial, Klink filed a notice of self-defense under Crim.R. 12. The two cases were consolidated and tried together to the bench on February 8, 2024. At trial, the city presented evidence from M.K. and B.K. It also admitted into evidence a recording of the 911 call, a cell phone video, and body camera footage. Klink presented evidence from one of the arresting officers, Toledo Police Officer Daniel Wood. She also testified in her own defense. 2. A. The city’s case 1. M.K’s testimony {¶ 4} M.K. testified that he and Klink argued for a long time on the night of September 28, 2023. Klink was particularly angry because her mother wanted restrictions on Klink’s visits with Klink’s son, so she had to go to court the following day. Klink blamed M.K. for her custody problems. M.K. also claimed that Klink had been drinking, which tended to make her “pretty aggressive.” {¶ 5} As the argument escalated, M.K. went upstairs to get away from Klink, but she followed him to their room. She hit him and threw things at him, including an ashtray, which hit him in the chest. To escape the attack, he went downstairs, but again, she followed. In the kitchen, she pulled out a drawer, which fell, and she grabbed something out of the drawer. As M.K. was leaving through the broken screen door, Klink “jab[bed]” through the hole in the door with an object that “sliced” his elbow. Later, she also bit him on the elbow. When the police arrived, but before they were in earshot, Klink threatened to stab M.K. again, which made him fear for his safety. {¶ 6} M.K. denied that he physically attacked Klink, but he acknowledged that he did try to block her attacks. He claimed that he did nothing to provoke her and begged her to “knock it off.” {¶ 7} On cross-examination, M.K. denied drinking at all on September 28, 2023. He explained that the fight went on for hours because it would “stop and pick back up.” M.K. claimed that he pulled out his phone during the fight and took a video of Klink 3. because “usually, when I video, she stops and calms down.” In the video, there are utensils on the floor and M.K. can clearly be heard saying “you’re pulling knives and shit, bitch,” screaming, and telling Klink to stop. When asked about his actions as shown in the video, M.K. denied following Klink. M.K. testified that the police had previously been called to the house for fights, but nobody had been arrested. 2. B.K’s testimony and 911 call {¶ 8} B.K. is M.K.’s 16-year-old son. He was in the house during the fight. From the time B.K. arrived at t
Case Details
Case Details
Legal case information
Status
Decided
Date Decided
June 30, 2025
Jurisdiction
SA
Court Type
federal
Legal Significance
Case importance metrics
Metadata
Additional information
Quick Actions
Case management tools
Case Summary
Summary of the key points and legal principles
[Cite as Toledo v. Klink, 2025-Ohio-2316.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
LUCAS COUNTY
City of Toledo/State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-24-1251 L-24-1252 Appellee Trial Court No. 23 CRB 9484 23 CRB 11629 v.
Nicole Klink DECISION AND JUDGMENT
Appellant Decided: June 30, 2025
*****
Rebecca Facey, City of Toledo Prosecuting Attorney,
and Jimmie Jones, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Autumn Adams, for appellant.
*****
MAYLE, J.
{¶ 1} In this consolidated appeal, following a bench trial, defendant-appellant,
Nicole Klink, appeals the October 3, 2024 judgment of the Toledo Municipal Court, convicting her of two counts of domestic violence, one count of menacing, and one count
of assault. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court judgment.
I. Background
{¶ 2} On the night of September 28, 2023, Klink and her husband, M.K., had an
argument that became violent. At the time, Klink’s daughter and M.K.’s son, B.K., were
also in the house. B.K. overheard the fight and called 911. When the police arrived, they
spoke to everyone in the house and arrested Klink. After Klink’s arrest, the police filed
complaints that became the subject of two separate cases. In Toledo Municipal Court
case No. CRB-23-09484, Klink was charged with domestic violence menacing, a
violation of R.C. 2919.25(C), a fourth-degree misdemeanor, and menacing, a violation of
R.C. 2903.22(A), a fourth-degree misdemeanor. In Toledo Municipal Court case No.
CRB-23-11629, Klink was charged with domestic violence assault, a violation of R.C.
2919.25(A), a first-degree misdemeanor, and assault, a violation of R.C. 2903.13(A), a
first-degree misdemeanor.
{¶ 3} Before trial, Klink filed a notice of self-defense under Crim.R. 12. The two
cases were consolidated and tried together to the bench on February 8, 2024. At trial, the
city presented evidence from M.K. and B.K. It also admitted into evidence a recording of
the 911 call, a cell phone video, and body camera footage. Klink presented evidence
from one of the arresting officers, Toledo Police Officer Daniel Wood. She also testified
in her own defense.
A. The city’s case
1. M.K’s testimony
{¶ 4} M.K. testified that he and Klink argued for a long time on the night of
September 28, 2023. Klink was particularly angry because her mother wanted
restrictions on Klink’s visits with Klink’s son, so she had to go to court the following
day. Klink blamed M.K. for her custody problems. M.K. also claimed that Klink had
been drinking, which tended to make her “pretty aggressive.”
{¶ 5} As the argument escalated, M.K. went upstairs to get away from Klink, but
she followed him to their room. She hit him and threw things at him, including an
ashtray, which hit him in the chest. To escape the attack, he went downstairs, but again,
she followed. In the kitchen, she pulled out a drawer, which fell, and she grabbed
something out of the drawer. As M.K. was leaving through the broken screen door,
Klink “jab[bed]” through the hole in the door with an object that “sliced” his elbow.
Later, she also bit him on the elbow. When the police arrived, but before they were in
earshot, Klink threatened to stab M.K. again, which made him fear for his safety.
{¶ 6} M.K. denied that he physically attacked Klink, but he acknowledged that he
did try to block her attacks. He claimed that he did nothing to provoke her and begged
her to “knock it off.”
{¶ 7} On cross-examination, M.K. denied drinking at all on September 28, 2023.
He explained that the fight went on for hours because it would “stop and pick back up.”
M.K. claimed that he pulled out his phone during the fight and took a video of Klink
because “usually, when I video, she stops and calms down.” In the video, there are
utensils on the floor and M.K. can clearly be heard saying “you’re pulling knives and
shit, bitch,” screaming, and telling Klink to stop. When asked about his actions as shown
in the video, M.K. denied following Klink. M.K. testified that the police had previously
been called to the house for fights, but nobody had been arrested.
2. B.K’s testimony and 911 call
{¶ 8} B.K. is M.K.’s 16-year-old son. He was in the house during the fight. From
the time B.K. arrived at t
Case Information
Detailed case metadata and classifications
Court Proceedings
Document Details
Legal Classification
Judicial Panel
Similar Cases
Cases with similar legal principles and precedents
Case Details
Legal case information
Status
Decided
Date Decided
June 30, 2025
Jurisdiction
SA
Court Type
federal
Legal Significance
Case importance metrics
Metadata
Additional information
Quick Actions
Case management tools