Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc., 547 U.S. 356 (2006)
Primary Holding
A fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) may sue a beneficiary for reimbursement of medical expenses paid by the ERISA plan when the beneficiary has recovered damages from a third party, as long as the plan contains a valid reimbursement provision.
In the case of Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, a couple received medical payments from their health insurance plan after a car accident. When they later received a settlement from a lawsuit against the party responsible for the accident, the insurance company claimed it had the right to get back the money it had paid for their medical expenses. This case is important because it establishes that health insurance plans can require beneficiaries to repay them for medical costs if they recover money from someone else, as long as the plan clearly states this rule. For consumers, this means that if you have health insurance and you get injured due to someone else's actions, your insurance may expect to be paid back for any medical costs if you win money from a lawsuit. This case is relevant if you find yourself in a similar situation where you are receiving insurance benefits and then also get a settlement or award from a third party.
AI-generated plain-language summary to help you understand this case
In the case of Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc., Marlene Sereboff and her husband Joel were beneficiaries of a health insurance plan sponsored by Marlene's employer and administered by Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc. The plan included an "Acts of Third Parties" provision, which required beneficiaries to reimburse the insurer for medical expenses paid when they received benefits due to injuries caused by a third party. After the Sereboffs were injured in an automobile accident, the plan covered their medical expenses. Subsequently, they filed a tort action against several third parties seeking damages for their injuries. Mid Atlantic asserted a lien on the anticipated proceeds from the lawsuit, claiming reimbursement for the medical expenses it had paid on their behalf. The Sereboffs' tort suit eventually settled for $750,000, but they did not pay Mid Atlantic the claimed lien amount of $74,869.37, which represented the medical expenses incurred. In response, Mid Atlantic filed a lawsuit in District Court under ERISA, seeking to collect the owed amount. The District Court issued a temporary restraining order requiring the Sereboffs to preserve the lien amount from the settlement proceeds. After a ruling in favor of Mid Atlantic, the District Court ordered the Sereboffs to pay the owed amount plus interest, deducting a portion for attorney's fees and court costs incurred in the state court action. The Sereboffs appealed the decision, leading to the case being reviewed by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which affirmed the District Court's ruling. The case reached the Supreme Court of the United States on a writ of certiorari, where the Court examined the circumstances under which an ERISA fiduciary may seek reimbursement from a beneficiary for medical expenses paid when the beneficiary recovers from a third party. The underlying legal question was centered on the enforcement of the reimbursement provision in the context of ERISA and the rights of the health plan administrator to recover costs from beneficiaries who had received third-party settlements.
Whether a fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) may sue a beneficiary for reimbursement of medical expenses paid by the ERISA plan when the beneficiary has recovered damages from a third party.
The judgment of the Fourth Circuit is affirmed in relevant part.
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Decision Date
- March 28, 2006
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Case Type
- landmark
- Majority Author
- Roberts
- Damages Awarded
- N/A
- Data Quality
- high
LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc., 552 U.S. 248 (2008)
Consumer WonA participant in a defined contribution pension plan may sue a fiduciary under §502(a)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) for breaches of fiduciary duty that impair the value of their individual account, allowing for recovery that benefits the individual rather than solely the plan as a whole.
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn, 554 U.S. 105 (2008)
Consumer WonA plan administrator's dual role as both the decision-maker and the payor of benefits creates a conflict of interest, which a reviewing court must consider as a factor in determining whether the administrator abused its discretion in denying benefits under ERISA.
Beck v. PACE Int’l Union, 551 U.S. 96 (2007)
Consumer LostAn employer that sponsors and administers a single-employer defined-benefit pension plan does not have a fiduciary obligation under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) to consider a merger with a multiemployer plan as a method of terminating the plan.
United States v. Atlantic Research Corp., 551 U.S. 128 (2007)
Consumer WonPotentially responsible parties (PRPs) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) may recover cleanup costs from other PRPs through a cause of action provided by §107(a).