Reginald James Ryan v. The People of the State of Colorado
Court
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided
June 16, 2025
Jurisdiction
S
Importance
53%
Practice Areas
Case Summary
<div data-spec-version="0.0.3dev" data-generated-on="2025-06-22"> <div class="generated-from-iceberg vlex-toc"> <link href="https://doc-stylesheets.vlex.com/ldml-xml.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"></link> <div class="ldml-decision"><div class="ldml-decision"><div class="ldml-header header ldml-header content__heading content__heading--depth1" data-refglobal="case:ryanvpeopleofthestateofcoloradono25sc183june16,2025" data-content-heading-label="Header"><p class="ldml-metadata"> 1 </p><p class="ldml-metadata"><b class="ldml-bold"> <span class="ldml-party"><span class="ldml-name">Reginald James Ryan</span>, <span class="ldml-role">Petitioner</span></span> </b><b class="ldml-bold"> v. </b><b class="ldml-bold"> <span class="ldml-party"><span class="ldml-name">The People of the State of Colorado</span>, <span class="ldml-role">Respondent</span></span> </b></p><p class="ldml-metadata"><span class="ldml-cite"><b class="ldml-bold">No. 25SC183</b></span></p><p class="ldml-metadata"><b class="ldml-bold"><span class="ldml-court">Supreme Court of Colorado</span>, En Banc</b></p><p class="ldml-metadata"><span class="ldml-date"><b class="ldml-bold">June 16, 2025</b></span></p></div> <div class="ldml-casehistory"><p data-paragraph-id="158" class="ldml-paragraph "> <span data-paragraph-id="158" data-sentence-id="175" class="ldml-sentence"><span class="ldml-entity">Court of Appeals</span> <span class="ldml-entity"><a class="ldml-reference" data-prop-ids="sentence_175" data-reftype="reporter"><span class="ldml-cite">Case No. 23CA335</span></a></span></span> </p></div><div class="ldml-opinion content__heading content__heading--depth1" data-content-heading-label="Opinion"><p data-paragraph-id="215" class="ldml-paragraph "> <span data-paragraph-id="215" data-sentence-id="231" class="ldml-sentence"><span class="ldml-entity">Petition for Writ</span> of Certiorari DENIED.</span> </p></div></div></div> </div> </div>
Case Details
Case Details
Legal case information
Status
Decided
Date Decided
June 16, 2025
Jurisdiction
S
Court Type
federal
Legal Significance
Case importance metrics
Metadata
Additional information
Quick Actions
Case management tools
Case Summary
AI-generated comprehensive summary with legal analysis
Case Overview
Case Name: Reginald James Ryan v. The People of the State of Colorado
Citation: No. 25SC183
Court: Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc
Date: June 16, 2025
Jurisdiction: State of Colorado
This case involves a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by Reginald James Ryan against The People of the State of Colorado. The Supreme Court of Colorado reviewed the lower court's decision and ultimately denied the petition.
Key Legal Issues
- Writ of Certiorari: The primary legal issue was whether the Supreme Court should grant a writ of certiorari to review the decision made by the Court of Appeals.
- Appeal Process: The implications of the appeal process in the context of criminal law and procedural fairness.
Court's Decision
The Supreme Court of Colorado DENIED the petition for a writ of certiorari. This decision indicates that the court found no substantial legal question warranting further review of the lower court's ruling.
Legal Reasoning
The court's denial suggests that the issues raised by Ryan did not meet the threshold for review under Colorado law. The court likely considered factors such as:
- The sufficiency of the evidence presented in the lower court.
- Whether the legal arguments made were compelling enough to merit a higher court's attention.
Key Holdings
- The petition for writ of certiorari was denied, affirming the lower court's decision.
- The ruling emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural standards in the appellate process.
Precedents and Citations
While the specific precedents cited in this case are not detailed in the available text, it is essential to note that the court's decision aligns with established legal principles regarding the denial of certiorari petitions. Generally, courts may look to:
- Colorado Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Previous rulings on the standards for granting certiorari.
Practical Implications
- This case underscores the challenges faced by petitioners in seeking higher court review, particularly in criminal matters.
- Legal practitioners should be aware of the stringent criteria for certiorari petitions, which often require demonstrating significant legal errors or issues of public importance.
- The denial of certiorari can serve as a reminder of the finality of lower court decisions unless compelling reasons are presented.
In summary, the Supreme Court of Colorado's decision in Reginald James Ryan v. The People of the State of Colorado highlights the complexities of the appellate process and the stringent requirements for obtaining a writ of certiorari. Legal professionals must navigate these challenges carefully to advocate effectively for their clients.
Legal Topics
Areas of law covered in this case
Case Information
Detailed case metadata and classifications
Court Proceedings
Document Details
Legal Classification
Similar Cases
Cases with similar legal principles and precedents
Case Details
Legal case information
Status
Decided
Date Decided
June 16, 2025
Jurisdiction
S
Court Type
federal
Legal Significance
Case importance metrics
Metadata
Additional information
Quick Actions
Case management tools