Legal Case

Leveque 41, L.L.C. v. Leveque Tower Condominium Assn., Inc.

Citation

2025 Ohio 2055

Court

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided

June 10, 2025

Jurisdiction

SA

Importance

46%

Significant

Case Summary

[Cite as Leveque 41, L.L.C. v. Leveque Tower Condominium Assn., Inc., 2025-Ohio-2055.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Leveque 41, LLC et al., : Plaintiffs-Appellants, : No. 24AP-368 (C.P.C. No. 23CV-4780) v. : (REGULAR CALENDAR) The Leveque Tower Condominium : Association, Inc. et al., : Defendants-Appellees. : DECISION Rendered on June 10, 2025 On brief: Loveland Law, LLC, and Bryan S. Hunt, for appellants. Argued: Bryan S. Hunt. On brief: Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease, LLP, Joseph R. Miller and Elizabeth S. Alexander, for appellees The LeVeque Tower Condominium Association, Inc., and Lawyers Development Company, LLC. Argued: Joseph R. Miller. On brief: Arnold & Clifford LLP, James Arnold, Damian M. Clifford, and Gerhardt A. Gosnell II, for appellee Tower 10, LLC and Lawyers Development Company, LLC. On brief: Baker & Hostetler LLP, Albert G. Lin, Robert J. Tucker, and Christopher K. Riedel, for appellees The LeVeque Tower Condominium Association, Inc., Stephanie Chitwood, David Feltman, Drew Meyers, Robert Meyers, Brett Kaufman, Frank Sasso, First LeVeque, LLC and LVQ, LLC. On brief: Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder Co., LPA, Steven K. Kelley, and Frank H. Scialdone; Willis Law Firm, LLC, and Dimitri G. Hatzifotinos, for appellee Link Real Estate Group, LLC. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas No. 24AP-368 2 EDELSTEIN, J. {¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, LeVeque 41, LLC, LeVeque Forty, LLC, and Towertop II, LLC (collectively “appellants”), appeal from a decision and order granting the motion of defendants-appellees, The Leveque Tower Condominium Association, Inc. (“the condo association”), Link Property Management Company, Lawyer’s Development Company, LLC, Stephanie Chitwood, David Feltman, Robert Habeeb, Brett Kaufman, Ian Labitue, Drew Meyers, Robert Meyers, Frank Sasso, Amanda Wilson, First LeVeque, LLC, LVQ, LLC, and Tower 10, LLC to stay further proceedings pending arbitration. For the following reasons, we affirm. I. Facts and Procedural History {¶ 2} Appellants are the owners of four condominium units in LeVeque Tower, a building in Columbus, Ohio. Appellees include the condo association, nine individual members of the condo association’s board, and five business entities. Two of the business entities—Link and Lawyer’s Development—provided property management for the association. The remaining three business entities—First LeVeque, LLC, LVQ, LLC, and Tower 10—are the owners of additional condominium units in LeVeque Tower. {¶ 3} Appellants initially filed a complaint on July 7, 2016, followed by an amended complaint on July 31, 2023. As set forth in appellants’ amended complaint, the original declaration formed The LeVeque Tower Condominium and created the condo association in accordance with R.C. 5311.08(A)(1). On June 17, 2015, the amended declaration fully amended and restated the original declaration. The amended declaration includes the condo association’s current bylaws. {¶ 4} Appellants alleged LVQ owns 15 condo units and appointed one board member, First LeVeque owns 11 condo units and appointed one board member, and Tower 10 owns 17 condo units and appointed one board member. Appellants further alleged Robert Meyers, one of the individual appellees, has an ownership stake in First LeVeque, Tower 10, and LVQ and has “taken control of the Board.” (Am. Compl. at ¶ 37, 196.) The amended complaint generally alleged the condo association, the named board members, and the unit owner appellees intentionally disregarded the obligations owed to all unit owners by allowing collection delinquencies in condominium assessments owed by LVQ, No. 24AP-368 3 First LeVeque, and Tower 10. These collection delinquencies allegedly totaled over $ 1 million. (Am. Compl. at ¶ 56.) {¶ 5} In their amended complaint, appellants asserted claims for: (1) declaratory judgment related to the collection of assessments; (2) declaratory judgme

NEW FEATURE

Agentic Research

Unlock the power of AI-driven legal research. Our advanced agentic system autonomously analyzes cases, identifies patterns, and delivers comprehensive insights in minutes, not hours.

AI-Powered Analysis
Precise Legal Research
10x Faster Results

Join 2,500+ legal professionals

Case Details

Case Details

Legal case information

Status

Decided

Date Decided

June 10, 2025

Jurisdiction

SA

Court Type

federal

Legal Significance

Case importance metrics

Importance Score
Significant
Score46%
Citations
0

Metadata

Additional information

AddedJun 10, 2025
UpdatedJun 10, 2025

Quick Actions

Case management tools

AI-enhanced legal analysis

Case Summary

Summary of the key points and legal principles

Case Information

Detailed case metadata and classifications

Court Proceedings

Date FiledJune 10, 2025
Date DecidedJune 10, 2025

Document Details

Times Cited
0
Importance Score
0.5

Legal Classification

JurisdictionSA
Court Type
federal
Judicial Panel
Edelstein
Opinion Author
Edelstein