Garrett M. Hammond v. The People of the State of Colorado
Court
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided
June 17, 2025
Jurisdiction
S
Importance
53%
Practice Areas
Case Summary
<div data-spec-version="0.0.3dev" data-generated-on="2025-06-22"> <div class="generated-from-iceberg vlex-toc"> <link href="https://doc-stylesheets.vlex.com/ldml-xml.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"></link> <div class="ldml-decision"><div class="ldml-decision"><div class="ldml-header header ldml-header content__heading content__heading--depth1" data-refglobal="case:hammondvpeopleofthestateofcoloradono25sc186june17,2025" data-content-heading-label="Header"><p class="ldml-metadata"> 1 </p><p class="ldml-metadata"><b class="ldml-bold"> <span class="ldml-party"><span class="ldml-name">Garrett M. Hammond</span>, <span class="ldml-role">Petitioner</span></span> </b><b class="ldml-bold"> v. </b><b class="ldml-bold"> <span class="ldml-party"><span class="ldml-name">The People of the State of Colorado</span>, <span class="ldml-role">Respondent</span></span> </b></p><p class="ldml-metadata"><span class="ldml-cite"><b class="ldml-bold">No. 25SC186</b></span></p><p class="ldml-metadata"><b class="ldml-bold"><span class="ldml-court">Supreme Court of Colorado</span>, En Banc</b></p><p class="ldml-metadata"><span class="ldml-date"><b class="ldml-bold">June 17, 2025</b></span></p></div> <div class="ldml-casehistory"><p data-paragraph-id="157" class="ldml-paragraph "> <span data-paragraph-id="157" data-sentence-id="174" class="ldml-sentence"><span class="ldml-entity">Court of Appeals</span> <span class="ldml-entity"><a class="ldml-reference" data-prop-ids="sentence_174" data-reftype="reporter"><span class="ldml-cite">Case No. 23CA294</span></a></span></span> </p></div><div class="ldml-opinion content__heading content__heading--depth1" data-content-heading-label="Opinion"><p data-paragraph-id="214" class="ldml-paragraph "> <span data-paragraph-id="214" data-sentence-id="230" class="ldml-sentence"><span class="ldml-entity">Petition for Writ</span> of Certiorari DENIED.</span> </p></div></div></div> </div> </div>
Case Details
Case Details
Legal case information
Status
Decided
Date Decided
June 17, 2025
Jurisdiction
S
Court Type
federal
Legal Significance
Case importance metrics
Metadata
Additional information
Quick Actions
Case management tools
Case Summary
AI-generated comprehensive summary with legal analysis
Case Overview
Case Name: Garrett M. Hammond v. The People of the State of Colorado
Citation: No. 25SC186
Court: Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc
Date: June 17, 2025
Jurisdiction: S
This case involves Garrett M. Hammond as the petitioner against The People of the State of Colorado as the respondent. The Supreme Court of Colorado reviewed the case following a decision from the Court of Appeals (Case No. 23CA294). The central issue revolved around the petitioner's request for a writ of certiorari.
Key Legal Issues
- Writ of Certiorari: The primary legal question was whether the Supreme Court should grant the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the lower court's decision.
- Appellate Jurisdiction: The case also touches on the broader implications of appellate jurisdiction in Colorado's legal framework.
Court's Decision
The Supreme Court of Colorado DENIED the petition for writ of certiorari. This decision effectively upheld the ruling of the Court of Appeals, leaving the lower court's decision intact.
Legal Reasoning
The court's reasoning for denying the writ was not detailed in the case text provided. However, generally, a denial of certiorari indicates that the Supreme Court found no compelling reason to review the lower court's ruling. This can suggest that the appellate court's decision was consistent with established legal principles or that the issues raised did not warrant further judicial scrutiny.
Key Holdings
- The petition for a writ of certiorari was DENIED.
- The decision of the Court of Appeals stands, affirming the lower court's ruling.
Precedents and Citations
While specific precedents or citations were not detailed in the case text, the denial of certiorari often relies on established case law and procedural standards within Colorado's judicial system. It is important for practitioners to consider the implications of this case in relation to similar appellate matters.
Practical Implications
- Impact on Future Appeals: This ruling may serve as a precedent for future cases where petitioners seek a writ of certiorari, indicating the court's threshold for reviewing lower court decisions.
- Legal Strategy: Attorneys may need to reassess their strategies in presenting cases to the Supreme Court of Colorado, particularly concerning the grounds for seeking certiorari.
- Judicial Efficiency: The decision reflects the court's commitment to judicial efficiency, prioritizing cases that present significant legal questions or conflicts among lower courts.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court of Colorado's decision in Garrett M. Hammond v. The People of the State of Colorado highlights the complexities of appellate review and the importance of understanding the criteria for granting a writ of certiorari. Legal professionals should remain informed about the implications of such rulings on future cases and the broader legal landscape in Colorado.
Legal Topics
Areas of law covered in this case
Case Information
Detailed case metadata and classifications
Court Proceedings
Document Details
Legal Classification
Similar Cases
Cases with similar legal principles and precedents
Case Details
Legal case information
Status
Decided
Date Decided
June 17, 2025
Jurisdiction
S
Court Type
federal
Legal Significance
Case importance metrics
Metadata
Additional information
Quick Actions
Case management tools