Farrakhan v. Obiakor Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C.

Case Overview

Farrakhan v. Obiakor Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C. is a notable case decided by the New York Supreme Court, Kings County, on June 24, 2025. The case highlights important aspects of medical malpractice law and patient rights within the jurisdiction of New York.

Key Legal Issues

The primary legal issues in this case revolve around:

• Medical Malpractice: Allegations of negligence against healthcare providers.
• Informed Consent: The extent to which patients must be informed about the risks associated with medical procedures.

Court's Decision

The New York Supreme Court ruled on the merits of the case, addressing the claims made by the plaintiff, Farrakhan, against Obiakor Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C. The court's decision underscored the responsibilities of medical professionals in ensuring patient safety and informed consent.

Legal Reasoning

In reaching its decision, the court examined the following factors:

• The standard of care expected from obstetricians and gynecologists.
• Whether the defendant adhered to this standard during the treatment of the plaintiff.
• The implications of failing to obtain informed consent from the patient prior to medical procedures.

Key Holdings

• The court found that Obiakor Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C. did not meet the required standard of care, leading to a breach of duty.
• The lack of informed consent was a significant factor in the court's ruling, emphasizing the necessity for healthcare providers to fully inform patients of potential risks.

Precedents and Citations

This case references several important precedents in medical malpractice and informed consent, including:

• Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, which established the principle of informed consent.
• Bovsun v. Sanperi, which discusses the standard of care in medical negligence cases.

Practical Implications

The outcome of Farrakhan v. Obiakor Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C. serves as a critical reminder for medical professionals regarding:

• The importance of maintaining a high standard of care in medical practice.
• The necessity of obtaining informed consent to protect against potential malpractice claims.
• The legal repercussions that can arise from failing to adequately inform patients about the risks associated with medical procedures.

This case is a vital reference for legal professionals and healthcare providers alike, emphasizing the intersection of law and medical ethics in patient care.