Legal Case

Estate of Ryan Harsh v. McLaren Port Huron Hospital

Court

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided

June 20, 2025

Jurisdiction

SA

Importance

46%

Significant

Case Summary

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS MARSHA HARSH, Personal Representative of the UNPUBLISHED ESTATE OF RYAN HARSH, June 20, 2025 1:44 PM Plaintiff-Appellant, v Nos. 366392; 367927 St. Clair Circuit Court MCLAREN PORT HURON HOSPITAL, LC No. 19-001139-NH ARUNDHUTI BANERJEE, M.D., and ARUNDHUTI BANERJEE, M.D. PC, Defendants-Appellees, and FREDERICK WILLIAM COOP, M.D. and X-RAY ASSOCIATES OF PORT HURON PC, Defendants. MARSHA HARSH, Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF RYAN HARSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 366953 St. Clair Circuit Court MCLAREN PORT HURON HOSPITAL, LC No. 19-001139-NH FREDERICK WILLIAM COOP, M.D., and X-RAY ASSOCIATES OF PORT HURON, PC, Defendants, and -1- ARUNDHUTI BANERJEE, M.D. and ARUNDHUTI BANERJEE, M.D. PC, Defendants-Appellees. Before: MALDONADO, P.J., and M. J. KELLY and RIORDAN, JJ. PER CURIAM. In this medical malpractice action, plaintiff appeals by leave granted and as of right the trial court’s orders granting summary disposition to defendants McLaren Port Huron Hospital (McLaren), Arundhuti Banerjee, M.D. and Arundhuti Banerjee, M.D., P.C.1 The trial court dismissed plaintiff’s claims on the ground that she failed to create a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether Dr. Banerjee’s alleged negligence proximately caused the death of plaintiff’s decedent, Ryan Harsh. After careful review of the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, we conclude that the trial court erred. Accordingly, we reverse the orders of the trial court and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. I. BACKGROUND In May 2014, Harsh, a 36-year old autistic individual, lived with his mother, plaintiff. On the morning of May 25, 2024, Ryan experienced “seizure” activity and fell in his home. Plaintiff called 911 at 7:53 a.m., and emergency medical services (EMS) transported Ryan to McLaren where he arrived at 8:29 a.m. EMS technicians noted that Ryan was alert but combative. At McLaren, Christopher Hunt, M.D., a specialist in emergency medicine, evaluated Ryan and found him to have an “altered mental status.” Dr. Hunt ordered a computed tomography (CT) scan of the brain without contrast. At 10:34 a.m., defendant Frederick William Coop, M.D., a radiologist, interpreted the CT scan ordered by Dr. Hunt. Dr. Coop included the following observations in his report: FINDINGS: The study is compromised by motion artifact in spite of multiple attempts to obtain non-motion images. Central structures are midline. There is no evidence of hydrocephalus. There is an area of decreased attenuation in the posterior left parietal region. This is not well visualized. There is no evidence of mass effect or midline shift. I do not see evidence of intracranial blood. Notably, as part of his “Impressions,” Dr. Coop recommended that a repeat CT scan be performed with Ryan sedated. Dr. Hunt treated Ryan in the emergency department until approximately noon 1 This Court consolidated this appeal by right with two previous appeals by leave granted. Estate of Ryan Harsh v McLaren Port Huron Hosp, unpublished order of the Court of Appeals, entered July 16, 2024 (Docket Nos. 366392, 366953, and 367927). -2- on May 25, 2014. Regarding the CT scan, Dr. Hunt noted: “CT shows some attenuation in the parietal region on the right but could be motion artifact.” Ryan was transferred from the emergency department and admitted into the medical floor under the care of Dr. Banerjee, an internal medicine physician. Dr. Banerjee requested a neurology consultation which neurologist Marwan Shuayto, M.D., received at 12:43 p.m. Dr. Shuayto evaluated Ryan sometime before 2:36 p.m. According to Dr. Shuayto’s progress notes, he ordered a repeat CT scan, however, it is unclear from the record when the order was made. But it is clear that sometime on May 26, 2014, attempts were made to repeat the scan, but a scan was not done because “the patient was very restless.” Then on either the late afternoon or early evening of May 26, 2014, Ryan was found unresponsive. A “code”

NEW FEATURE

Agentic Research

Unlock the power of AI-driven legal research. Our advanced agentic system autonomously analyzes cases, identifies patterns, and delivers comprehensive insights in minutes, not hours.

AI-Powered Analysis
Precise Legal Research
10x Faster Results

Join 2,500+ legal professionals

Case Details

Case Details

Legal case information

Status

Decided

Date Decided

June 20, 2025

Jurisdiction

SA

Court Type

federal

Legal Significance

Case importance metrics

Importance Score
Significant
Score46%
Citations
0

Metadata

Additional information

AddedJun 21, 2025
UpdatedJun 21, 2025

Quick Actions

Case management tools

AI-enhanced legal analysis

Case Summary

Summary of the key points and legal principles

Case Information

Detailed case metadata and classifications

Court Proceedings

Date FiledJune 20, 2025
Date DecidedJune 20, 2025

Document Details

Times Cited
0
Importance Score
0.5

Legal Classification

JurisdictionSA
Court Type
federal
Judicial Panel
Allie Greenleaf Maldonado
Michael J. Kelly
Michael J. Riordan
Opinion Author
Allie Greenleaf Maldonado