Danilyan v. Toothsavers Dental Servs., P.C.

Case Overview

Danilyan v. Toothsavers Dental Servs., P.C. is a notable legal case decided on July 1, 2025. The case is cited as 2025 NY Slip Op 51063(U). Although the full text of the decision is not available, the metadata provides essential insights into the legal issues at hand.

Key Legal Issues

The case primarily revolves around the following legal issues:

• Dental malpractice claims against Toothsavers Dental Services.
• Patient rights and the standard of care expected in dental practices.
• Liability of dental service providers in cases of alleged negligence.

Court's Decision

While the specific details of the court's decision are not provided, the ruling would typically address the merits of the claims made by Danilyan against Toothsavers Dental Services, focusing on whether the dental practice met the required standard of care.

Legal Reasoning

In cases involving dental malpractice, courts often consider:

• The standard of care expected from dental professionals.
• Evidence of negligence or failure to adhere to established practices.
• The impact of alleged malpractice on the patient's health and well-being.

Key Holdings

• The court's ruling will likely clarify the responsibility of dental professionals in providing care.
• It may establish precedents regarding patient consent and the informed consent doctrine in dental procedures.

Precedents and Citations

While specific precedents are not cited in the metadata, similar cases often reference:

• Bovsun v. Sanperi, which discusses the standard of care in medical malpractice.
• Burgess v. Tully, focusing on patient rights and informed consent.

Practical Implications

This case underscores the importance of:

• Understanding patient rights in dental care settings.
• The necessity for dental professionals to maintain a high standard of care to avoid liability.
• The potential for legal action in cases of perceived negligence, which can impact dental practices significantly.

Legal professionals and dental practitioners should closely monitor the outcomes of this case as it may influence future malpractice claims and the operational standards within dental services.