Legal Case

Alucious Williams, Jr. v. Nurse Fletcher

Court

Unknown Court

Decided

August 1, 2025

Importance

34%

Standard

Practice Areas

Medical Malpractice
Negligence Law

Case Summary

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6399 Doc: 14 Filed: 08/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-6399 ALUCIOUS WILLIAMS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NURSE FLETCHER; NURSE CRAFT; NURSE PRACTIONER J. BLEDSOE, Defendants - Appellees, and SGT. ALLEN; SGT. GRUBBS; SGT. MAYES; C/O ROSE; LT. BARTON, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Elizabeth K. Dillon, Chief District Judge. (7:24-cv-00127-EKD-CKM) Submitted: July 29, 2025 Decided: August 1, 2025 Before KING, WYNN, and BERNER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alucious Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Salvatore Cottone, Michael Ryan Millstein, BYRNE CANAAN LAW, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6399 Doc: 14 Filed: 08/01/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Alucious Williams, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). “Ordinarily, a district court order is not final until it has resolved all claims as to all parties.” Porter v. Zook, 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015) (citation modified). Because the district court has not resolved Williams’s claims against the remaining defendants, the order he seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

NEW FEATURE

Agentic Research

Unlock the power of AI-driven legal research. Our advanced agentic system autonomously analyzes cases, identifies patterns, and delivers comprehensive insights in minutes, not hours.

AI-Powered Analysis
Precise Legal Research
10x Faster Results

Join 2,500+ legal professionals

Case Details

Case Details

Legal case information

Status

Decided

Date Decided

August 1, 2025

Legal Significance

Case importance metrics

Importance Score
Standard
Score34%
Citations
0
Legal Topics
Duty of Care
Informed Consent
Negligence

Metadata

Additional information

AddedAug 3, 2025
UpdatedAug 4, 2025

Quick Actions

Case management tools

AI-enhanced legal analysis

Case Summary

Summary of the key points and legal principles

Legal Topics

Areas of law covered in this case

Duty of Care
Informed Consent
Negligence

Case Information

Detailed case metadata and classifications

Court Proceedings

Date FiledAugust 1, 2025
Date DecidedAugust 1, 2025

Document Details

Times Cited
0
Importance Score
0.3