Alucious Williams, Jr. v. Nurse Fletcher
Court
Unknown Court
Decided
August 1, 2025
Importance
34%
Practice Areas
Case Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6399 Doc: 14 Filed: 08/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-6399 ALUCIOUS WILLIAMS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NURSE FLETCHER; NURSE CRAFT; NURSE PRACTIONER J. BLEDSOE, Defendants - Appellees, and SGT. ALLEN; SGT. GRUBBS; SGT. MAYES; C/O ROSE; LT. BARTON, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Elizabeth K. Dillon, Chief District Judge. (7:24-cv-00127-EKD-CKM) Submitted: July 29, 2025 Decided: August 1, 2025 Before KING, WYNN, and BERNER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alucious Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Salvatore Cottone, Michael Ryan Millstein, BYRNE CANAAN LAW, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6399 Doc: 14 Filed: 08/01/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Alucious Williams, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). “Ordinarily, a district court order is not final until it has resolved all claims as to all parties.” Porter v. Zook, 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015) (citation modified). Because the district court has not resolved Williams’s claims against the remaining defendants, the order he seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Case Details
Case Details
Legal case information
Status
Decided
Date Decided
August 1, 2025
Legal Significance
Case importance metrics
Metadata
Additional information
Quick Actions
Case management tools
Case Summary
Summary of the key points and legal principles
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6399 Doc: 14 Filed: 08/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6399
ALUCIOUS WILLIAMS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NURSE FLETCHER; NURSE CRAFT; NURSE PRACTIONER J. BLEDSOE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
SGT. ALLEN; SGT. GRUBBS; SGT. MAYES; C/O ROSE; LT. BARTON,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Elizabeth K. Dillon, Chief District Judge. (7:24-cv-00127-EKD-CKM)
Submitted: July 29, 2025 Decided: August 1, 2025
Before KING, WYNN, and BERNER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alucious Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Salvatore Cottone, Michael Ryan
Millstein, BYRNE CANAAN LAW, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6399 Doc: 14 Filed: 08/01/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Alucious Williams, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S.
541, 545-46 (1949). “Ordinarily, a district court order is not final until it has resolved all
claims as to all parties.” Porter v. Zook, 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015) (citation
modified). Because the district court has not resolved Williams’s claims against the
remaining defendants, the order he seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Legal Topics
Areas of law covered in this case
Case Information
Detailed case metadata and classifications
Court Proceedings
Document Details
Similar Cases
Cases with similar legal principles and precedents
Case Details
Legal case information
Status
Decided
Date Decided
August 1, 2025
Legal Significance
Case importance metrics
Metadata
Additional information
Quick Actions
Case management tools