Aleksandr Kolpakov v. The People of the State of Colorado
Court
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided
June 16, 2025
Jurisdiction
S
Importance
53%
Practice Areas
Case Summary
<div data-spec-version="0.0.3dev" data-generated-on="2025-06-22"> <div class="generated-from-iceberg vlex-toc"> <link href="https://doc-stylesheets.vlex.com/ldml-xml.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"></link> <div class="ldml-decision"><div class="ldml-decision"><div class="ldml-header header ldml-header content__heading content__heading--depth1" data-content-heading-label="Header" data-refglobal="case:kolpakovvpeopleofthestateofcoloradono25sc171june16,2025"><p class="ldml-metadata"> 1 </p><p class="ldml-metadata"><b class="ldml-bold"> <span class="ldml-party"><span class="ldml-name">Aleksandr Kolpakov</span>, <span class="ldml-role">Petitioner</span></span> </b><b class="ldml-bold"> v. </b><b class="ldml-bold"> <span class="ldml-party"><span class="ldml-name">The People of the State of Colorado</span>, <span class="ldml-role">Respondent</span></span> </b></p><p class="ldml-metadata"><span class="ldml-cite"><b class="ldml-bold">No. 25SC171</b></span></p><p class="ldml-metadata"><b class="ldml-bold"><span class="ldml-court">Supreme Court of Colorado</span>, En Banc</b></p><p class="ldml-metadata"><span class="ldml-date"><b class="ldml-bold">June 16, 2025</b></span></p></div> <div class="ldml-casehistory"><p data-paragraph-id="157" class="ldml-paragraph "> <span data-paragraph-id="157" data-sentence-id="174" class="ldml-sentence"><span class="ldml-entity">Court of Appeals</span> <span class="ldml-entity"><a class="ldml-reference" data-reftype="reporter" data-prop-ids="sentence_174"><span class="ldml-cite">Case No. 23CA832</span></a></span></span> </p></div><div class="ldml-opinion content__heading content__heading--depth1" data-content-heading-label="Opinion"><p data-paragraph-id="214" class="ldml-paragraph "> <span data-paragraph-id="214" data-sentence-id="230" class="ldml-sentence"><span class="ldml-entity">Petition for Writ</span> of Certiorari DENIED.</span> </p><p data-paragraph-id="276" class="ldml-paragraph "> <span data-paragraph-id="276" data-sentence-id="299" class="ldml-sentence"><span class="ldml-entity">JUSTICE <span class="ldml-entity">HOOD</span></span> does not participate.</span> </p></div></div></div> </div> </div>
Case Details
Case Details
Legal case information
Status
Decided
Date Decided
June 16, 2025
Jurisdiction
S
Court Type
federal
Legal Significance
Case importance metrics
Metadata
Additional information
Quick Actions
Case management tools
Case Summary
AI-generated comprehensive summary with legal analysis
Case Overview
Case Name: Aleksandr Kolpakov v. The People of the State of Colorado
Citation: No. 25SC171
Court: Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc
Date: June 16, 2025
This case involves a petition for a writ of certiorari by Aleksandr Kolpakov against the People of the State of Colorado. The Supreme Court of Colorado reviewed the lower court's decision, which originated from the Court of Appeals (Case No. 23CA832).
Key Legal Issues
The primary legal issues in this case include:
- Writ of Certiorari: The procedural aspects and standards for granting a writ of certiorari in Colorado.
- Judicial Review: The scope of judicial review concerning lower court decisions.
Court's Decision
The Supreme Court of Colorado DENIED the petition for writ of certiorari. This decision indicates that the court found no compelling reason to review the lower court's ruling.
Justice Hood did not participate in this decision, which may have implications for the court's composition and the dynamics of the ruling.
Legal Reasoning
The court's denial of the writ suggests that the justices did not find any significant legal questions or errors in the lower court's proceedings that warranted their intervention. The decision reflects the court's discretion in choosing cases that present substantial legal issues or conflicts in the law.
Key Holdings
- The petition for writ of certiorari was DENIED.
- Justice Hood's non-participation is noted, which may affect the interpretation of the ruling.
Precedents and Citations
While the case does not explicitly cite prior precedents, it is essential to consider the following general principles relevant to writs of certiorari:
- Colorado Rules of Appellate Procedure: Guidelines governing the issuance of writs in Colorado.
- Judicial Discretion: Courts have broad discretion in determining whether to grant certiorari based on the significance of the issues presented.
Practical Implications
The denial of certiorari in Kolpakov v. Colorado underscores the challenges petitioners face in seeking higher court review. Legal practitioners should note the following implications:
- Limited Review: The decision reinforces the limited scope of appellate review in Colorado, emphasizing the importance of thorough legal arguments at the trial and appellate levels.
- Judicial Resource Allocation: The court's discretion in denying certiorari indicates a focus on managing judicial resources effectively, prioritizing cases with broader implications for the law.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court of Colorado's ruling in Aleksandr Kolpakov v. The People of the State of Colorado serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in appellate procedures and the importance of presenting compelling legal arguments to secure higher court review.
Legal Topics
Areas of law covered in this case
Case Information
Detailed case metadata and classifications
Court Proceedings
Document Details
Legal Classification
Similar Cases
Cases with similar legal principles and precedents
Case Details
Legal case information
Status
Decided
Date Decided
June 16, 2025
Jurisdiction
S
Court Type
federal
Legal Significance
Case importance metrics
Metadata
Additional information
Quick Actions
Case management tools