Akuna v. Stehl

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-25-00085-CV GREGORY S. THOMAS AND T-4 FARM, § On Appeal from the 17th District LLC, Appellants Court § of Tarrant County (17-360705-25) V. § June 19, 2025 BRIAN C. THOMAS, INDIVIDUALLY § Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice AND ON BEHALF OF POST OAK OIL & Sudderth GAS, LP AND POST OAK OIL & GAS GP, LLC, Appellee JUDGMENT This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. It is further ordered that Gregory S. Thomas and T-4 Farm, LLC shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS COLLIN McCLEARY, § No. 08-24-00116-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § 109th District Court CTL CORP., § of Winkler County, Texas Appellee. § (TC# DC20-17766) JUDGMENT The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee recover from Appellant all costs of appeal, and that this decision be certified below for observance. IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of June 2025. MARIA SALAS MENDOZA, Chief Justice Before Salas Mendoza, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ. Palafox, J., concurring without written opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS TRANSPORTATION CONCEPTS, INC. § and ELOY CANALES, No. 08-24-00036-CV § Appellants, Appeal from the § v. 131st District Court § of Bexar County, Texas BRIAN RAMIREZ, § Appellee. (TC# 2021CI04603) § JUDGMENT The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the judgment. We therefore reverse and render judgment in favor of Transportation Concepts Inc., on the theory of direct liability alleged against it. We reverse and remand for new trial on Brian Ramirez’s claim against Eloy Canales. We further order that Appellants recover from Appellee all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance. IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of June 2025. GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice Before Salas Mendoza, C.J., Palafox, J., and Rodriguez, C.J. (Ret) Rodriguez, C.J. (Ret.) (Sitting by Assignment)

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 13-25-00162-CV Christine Yin and Kimsour Sin d/b/a Christine Ocean Seafood & Grill v. Dorothy Ramirez On Appeal from the 135th District Court of Victoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 22-07-88876-B JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellants. We further order this decision certified below for observance. June 26, 2025

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 13-24-00401-CV COUNTY OF HIDALGO, TEXAS v. FABIANA CARLOS On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7 of Hidalgo County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CL-21-2055-G JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellee. We further order this decision certified below for observance. June 26, 2025